https://www.the-ninth-age.com/index.php ... /&pageNo=1
Niestety same liczby i grafy, bez wytlumaczenia.
Chyba troche zaskoczen.
W kazdym razie BH najlepsze i na teamach i na singlach. Potwierdzone info
Data Report dla 1.3
Data Report dla 1.3
Wreszcie po roku przerwy pojawił się nowy Torunament Data Report.
https://www.the-ninth-age.com/index.php ... /&pageNo=1
Niestety same liczby i grafy, bez wytlumaczenia.
Chyba troche zaskoczen.
W kazdym razie BH najlepsze i na teamach i na singlach. Potwierdzone info
https://www.the-ninth-age.com/index.php ... /&pageNo=1
Niestety same liczby i grafy, bez wytlumaczenia.
Chyba troche zaskoczen.
W kazdym razie BH najlepsze i na teamach i na singlach. Potwierdzone info
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
-
swieta_barbara
- habydysz
- Posty: 14649
- Lokalizacja: Jeźdźcy Hardkoru
Date - data, randka
Data - dane
Data - dane
Wygląda na to że WDG był jedną z najlepiej zbalansowanych armii
Złomowisko: https://goo.gl/photos/xRMRQZGkEgCpcHcx5
Nom, tak to jest hak sie tworzy watki na tablecie.swieta_barbara pisze:Date - data, randka
Data - dane
Mozna to jakos poprawic?
Ostatnio zmieniony 6 gru 2017, o 10:09 przez JarekK, łącznie zmieniany 2 razy.
Powód: Już :)
Powód: Już :)
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
thx JarekK
btw ktos dal male wyjasnienie na forum DE.
You can't actually say 4 armies are below ours. Statistically DE is indistinguishable from most of the armies. (Even OnG is statistically indistinguishable from most armies)You can say that BH and DL are likely significantly better than DE. Maybe ID (but I'd have to actually do a test to determine that one, especially as ID has a super-low sample size relative to DE, which makes it harder to judge based on error bars).
btw ktos dal male wyjasnienie na forum DE.
You can't actually say 4 armies are below ours. Statistically DE is indistinguishable from most of the armies. (Even OnG is statistically indistinguishable from most armies)You can say that BH and DL are likely significantly better than DE. Maybe ID (but I'd have to actually do a test to determine that one, especially as ID has a super-low sample size relative to DE, which makes it harder to judge based on error bars).
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
i wyjasnienie czlonka Balance Teamu do danych
Unofficial brief BLT answer (because I don't have time to formally vet the answer with the whole team, but I believe it to be fairly representative):
As it happens, the data report broadly agreed with BLT thoughts already, so in some sense we proceeded according to our own experience anyway.
We also think the main conclusion that can be drawn from the DA report is that broadly the game is pretty well balanced externally.
It is not perfect, but it never will be (which won't stop us trying of course).
In addition, the core rules changes going into 2.0 mean that the external balance is more difficult to act upon correctly.
For these two reasons, BLT focussed more (but not exclusively) on internal balance (which isn't to say we got it right of course
)
That said, we had an approximate goal in our heads, which was to balance to the upper middle of 1.3.
So, the best 2-3 armies will come down a touch, the next 3ish will stay broadly the same, and the others will all increase in power to varying extent.
Of course, there is a big error on this attempt, because of the core rules changes.
We expect there to be more of a focus on external balance during the public beta test.
Unofficial brief BLT answer (because I don't have time to formally vet the answer with the whole team, but I believe it to be fairly representative):
As it happens, the data report broadly agreed with BLT thoughts already, so in some sense we proceeded according to our own experience anyway.
We also think the main conclusion that can be drawn from the DA report is that broadly the game is pretty well balanced externally.
It is not perfect, but it never will be (which won't stop us trying of course).
In addition, the core rules changes going into 2.0 mean that the external balance is more difficult to act upon correctly.
For these two reasons, BLT focussed more (but not exclusively) on internal balance (which isn't to say we got it right of course
)That said, we had an approximate goal in our heads, which was to balance to the upper middle of 1.3.
So, the best 2-3 armies will come down a touch, the next 3ish will stay broadly the same, and the others will all increase in power to varying extent.
Of course, there is a big error on this attempt, because of the core rules changes.
We expect there to be more of a focus on external balance during the public beta test.
We can't stop here. This is bat country.
Tak to najpierw na forum T9A ludkowie się pytają, potem DanT pyta się mnie, potem pisze na forum T9A i przeklejone zostaje tutaj 
-
Slayer Zabójców
- Masakrator
- Posty: 2332
- Lokalizacja: Oleśnica
Myślę, że gdyby Rince grał DE w tym składzie(przede wszystkim grałEltharion pisze:I widać kto został mistrzem świata( i czyja drużyna miała w składzie de
)
) to wynik byłby taki sam 
-
Slayer Zabójców
- Masakrator
- Posty: 2332
- Lokalizacja: Oleśnica
Grał tylko jedną bitwęEltharion pisze:Primo grał w tym składzie secundo biorąc pod uwagę że w tym roku woli jechać skavenami to zakladam że z wolnej woli by nimi nie grał xD
Każdy lubi grać czymś innym - może wyrósł z elfów 
